How are
ozone depletion and climate change related?
Stratospheric ozone depletion and climate change are both
effects of human activities on the global atmosphere. They
are distinct environ-mental problems, but are linked in a
number of ways. Some of the main potential interactions
are the following:
Ozone-depleting chemicals contribute to global warming
one-depleting chemicals can have an impact on the Earth's
heat balance as well as on the ozone layer because many of
them are greenhouse gases. For example, CFCs 11 and 12
(the two main chlorofluorocarbon compounds that destroy
ozone) are, respectively, 4000 and 8500 times more
powerful greenhouse gases than carbon dioxide (over a
period of 100 years). Fluorocarbon chemicals developed as
substitutes for CFCs are also powerful greenhouse gases.
Ozone depletion can affect climate
one is itself a greenhouse gas and the ozone layer play a
role in maintaining the planet's overall temperature
balance. Depletion of the ozone layer is currently thought
to reduce the greenhouse effect.
On the other hand, increased exposure
of the Earth's surface to UV-B due to ozone depletion
could alter the cycling of greenhouse gases, such as
carbon dioxide, in ways that could increase global
warming. In particular, increased UV-B is likely to
suppress primary production in terrestrial plants and
marine phyto-plankton, so reducing the amount of carbon
dioxide they absorb from the atmosphere.
Global warming could aggravate
ozone depletion
Global warming is expected to increase average
temperatures in the lower atmosphere-but it could cool
the stratosphere. This could increase ozone depletion
even with the same concentrations of man-made chemicals
reaching the stratosphere because very cold temperatures
favour special sorts of reactions that deplete ozone
more rapidly.
How is UV radiation level changing
at the Earth's surface?
Direct measurement of UV-B radiation levels is
technically complicated. However, there is overwhelming
scientific evidence that ozone depletion leads to more
UV-B reaching the Earth's surface, and that the amount
of increase can be predicted from trends in ozone
levels. On this basis, UV-B at mid-latitudes is
calculated to have increased by 8-10 per cent over the
last 15 years (the calculation is for UV-B radiation at
a wavelength of 310 nanometres at latitudes 45° north
and south over the period 1979-1994). Calculated
increases in UV-B to date are larger at higher latitudes
and for shorter wavelengths.
The first persistent increase in UV-B over densely
populated areas due to ozone depletion was measured in
1992/93. Several studies found large increases at
northern mid and high-latitudes. Measurements at
Toronto, Canada, suggested that UV-B at 300 nanometres
was 35 per cent higher than four years previously.
Large increases in UV-B have occurred in Antarctica due
to the annual ozone hole. In 1992, when ozone depletion
was especially severe, UV-B (in the range 298-303
nanometres) at the South Pole was four times higher than
in 1991. Surrounding regions have also been affected,
because when the polar vortex breaks down in the spring,
large quantities of ozone-depleted air drift toward
lower latitudes.
At a measurement station in southern Argentina,
biologically weighted levels of UV (a measure taking
into account the greater damage caused by shorter
wavelengths) were 45 per cent higher in December 1991
than is usual at this latitude. The increase was
equivalent to moving the site 20 per cent closer to the
equator.
Based on simulation models, peak levels of biologically
weighted UV-B reaching the Earth due to ozone depletion
are expected to be significantly higher than measured to
date. Relative to 1960, estimated maximum increases for
erythema induction and DNA damage at mid-latitudes are
shown in the table below. As with the estimates of
maximum ozone depletion given above, the figures are
subject to uncertainty; and they assume full compliance
from all parties in the global effort to phase out
ozone-depleting substances.
How does UV radiation affect human skin?
One of the most obvious effects of UV-B radiation is
sunburn, known technically as erythema. Dark-skinned
people are protected from most of this effect by pigment
in their skin cells. UV-B can also dam-age the genetic
material in skin cells, which can cause cancers. For
fair-skinned people, life-long exposure to high levels
of UV-B increases the risk of non-melanoma skin cancers.
Researchers have suggested that these kinds of skin
cancers are likely to increase by 2 per cent for each 1
per cent decrease of stratospheric ozone. There is also
some evidence that increased exposure to UV-B,
especially in childhood, can increase the risk of
developing more dangerous melanoma skin cancers.
How does UV radiation affect the eye?
In humans, exposure to UV-B from unusual directions can
cause snow blindness-actinic keratitis-a painful acute
inflammation of the cornea. Chronic exposure can also
damage the eye. Enhanced levels of UV-B could lead to
more people suffering from cataracts-a clouding of the
lens that impairs vision. Cataracts are a leading cause
of blindness, even though they can be effectively
treated through surgery in regions well provided with
medical care.
How does UV radiation affect the body's defences
against disease?
Exposure to UV-B can suppress immune responses in humans
and animals. Increased UV-B could therefore reduce human
resistance to a number of diseases, including cancers,
allergies and some infectious diseases. In areas of the
world where infectious diseases are already a major
problem, the added stress from increased UV-B could be
significant. This is especially true for diseases, such
as leishmaniasis, malaria and herpes, against which the
body's major defence is in the skin. Exposure to UV-B
can also affect the body's ability to respond to
vaccinations against diseases.
The effects of UV-B on the immune system are not
dependent on skin color. Dark-skinned and fair-skinned
people are equally at risk.
What effect does UV radiation have on plants?
Many species and varieties of plants are sensitive to
UV-B, even at present-day levels. Increased exposure
could have complex direct and indirect effects, both on
crops and natural ecosystems. Experiments have shown
that increased exposure to UV-B of crops such as rice
and soy beans results in smaller plants and lower
yields. Increased UV-B could alter crop plants
chemically, potentially reducing nutritional value or
increasing toxicity. If further ozone depletion is not
prevented, we will have to search for UV-B tolerant crop
varieties or breed new ones.
The implications for natural ecosystems are difficult to
predict, but could be significant. UV-B has a number of
indirect effects on plants, such as altering plant form,
biomass allocation to parts of the plant and production
of chemicals that prevent insect attack. Increased UV-B
could therefore lead to ecosystem-level effects, such as
changes in the competitive balance between plants,
animals that eat them and plant pathogens and pests.
What are the effects on marine and aquatic life?
Experiments have shown that increased UV-B harms
phytoplankton, zooplankton, juvenile fish and larval
crabs and shrimps. Harming these small organisms could
threaten the productivity of fisheries. More than 30 per
cent of animal protein consumed by humans comes from the
sea, and in many developing countries the share is
higher. In Antarctic seas, plankton production has
already been reduced under the annual ozone hole.
Marine life also plays an important role in global
climate because phyto-plankton absorb vast quantities of
carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas. A decrease in
phytoplankton production could leave more carbon dioxide
in the atmosphere, contributing to global warming.
|