People
of the Coastal Zone
Demography
According to the 2001 population census, there are about
6.85 million households in the coastalzone. The total
population of these households is about 35 million,
representing 28 percent of the population of Bangladesh.
They live in an area of 47,211 km2 , which is 32 percent
of the area of Bangladesh.
There are more men than women. The
sex ratio in the coastal zone is 102 compared to 104
outside the coastal zone.3 This may be a reflection of
male out-migration being relatively higher in the
coastal zone than in the rest of the country. Within the
coastal zone, Chittagong and Khulna with more
concentration of urban population have a higher sex
ratio (109 and 108 respectively, reflecting a relatively
high male in-migration). The average size of households
is 5.08. This is higher than in other parts of the
country (4.77) and is indicative of a higher dependency
ratio (Appendix 1).
The demographic dependency ratio4 is
1.06 compared to 1.01 outside the coastal zone. This is
mainly because of the higher concentration of children
and old people. In the coastal zone, 46 percent of the
people are below 15 years of age, which is likely to
have profound implications in the job market in the
future (Appendix 2).
Social stratification
Criteria
The society is not indivisible. Every individual is
unique, but there are sections of the population with
identical background, resource ownership, interests,
occupations and aspirations. They are often referred to
as social strata or classes. Although members of a
particular stratum may not be perfectly homogeneous,
they are often defined in terms of one or more common
denominators. In customary development literature,
social strata in a rural setting are often defined in
terms of economic condition with landholding as the
principal criterion. BBS literature also uses
landholding to categorize different strata of rural
households. In the 1996 agriculture census, households
are grouped into four broad strata. They are: non-farm
households owning less than 0.05 acre of land; small
farm households owning 0.05 to 2.49 acres of land;
medium farm households owning 2.50 to7.49 acres of land;
and large farm households owning 7.50 acres or more.
During the inter-census period
(agriculture census) between 1960 and 1996, the
composition of the rural households changed
significantly. The social stratification shows
concentration of households with no or small amount of
land on the one hand, and concentration of land with
fewer households on the other (see Table 1, Figure 2).
Table 1: Distribution of rural
households in the coastal zone
| Strata |
Percentage of
households |
|
1960 |
1996 |
| Non-farm |
19 |
30 |
| Small |
41 |
58 |
| Medium |
31 |
33 |
| Large |
9 |
2 |
| Total |
100 |
100 |
| Source:
District Gazetteers; BBS, 1999 |
Table 1
implies that in 1960, 40% of the households could make a
living from the land they owned; while in 1991, it is
only 13%. The pattern of household distribution in the
coastal zone is different from the non-coastal zone. In
the coastal zone, the proportion of non-farm households
is lower and that of small farmers is higher than other
parts of the country. The proportion of non-farm
households (landless) is higher in the Chittagong-Cox’s
Bazar area and lower in Barisal-Barguna-Pirojpur area.
Lakshmipur, Barisal and Chandpur have higher
concentration of small farmers, while Patuakhali and
Barguna have relatively higher proportions of large
farmers (for details, see Appendices 3 and 4).
Landholding alone does not necessarily define social
strata. People’s livelihoods largely center round
occupations. Intra-stratum relationship and cohesion
depend on how they are related to structure and
organization of production and this often works as
strength (or weakness) in the development of their
collective interests.
Income poverty
The coastal zone is relatively income-poor compared to
the rest of the country. Average per capita GDP (at
current market price) in the coastal zone was Tk 21,379
in 1999-2000, compared to Tk 22,684 outside the coastal
zone. Districts of Chittagong and Khulna have higher GDP
per capita, while Noakhali, Lakshmipur, Chandpur,
Shariatpur, Gopalganj and Jhalakati have much lower GDP
per capita (see Appendix 5).
Among the occupational groups,
incidence of poverty is the highest among agriculture
laborers (BBS, 2002b: 28). Their wages are low and
employment is also not regular because of the seasonal
character of agriculture. Proportion of population below
the officially acknowledged “extremepoverty” level
(income below $1/day) in Bangladesh is 29 percent (World
Bank 2003: 236). According to BBS data, average
agriculture wage rate in rural Bangladesh has been below
the “one $ line” for a long period (see Figure 3 and
Appendix 6). Average wage rate in the coastal zone is
relatively higher than the country average. Within the
coastal zone, agriculture wage rate is high in
Chittagong and Noakhali. In other districts, wages are
lower than the country average.

Data on industrial wage rates are
available for the major cities. In the coastal zone,
Khulna and Chittagong are the two major urban/industrial
centers. Industrial wage rate for jogali (unskilled
laborer) in Khulna is lower than the country average,
while that of Chittagong is higher (see Table 3).
Table 3: Industrial wage rate for
unskilled laborer
|
Location |
Daily wage (Tk) |
|
1995-96 |
1996-97 |
1997-98 |
1998-99 |
1999-00 |
|
Chittagong |
79 |
81 |
79 |
89 |
90 |
| khulna |
44 |
50 |
57 |
72 |
80 |
|
Bangladesh |
69 |
72 |
79 |
81 |
89 |
|
Source: BBS, 2002d. |
Food poverty
Extent of poverty in terms of calorie intake is
relatively high in the coastal zone. In the coastal
zone, 52 percent people are absolute poor and 25 percent
are extreme poor. Corresponding figures for Bangladesh
are 49 and 23 percent, respectively. Extreme poverty is
very high in Lakshmipur, Chandpur and Bagerhat (above
30%), and relatively low in Patuakhali, Narail and
Satkhira (below 15%).
Major livelihood groups
Land is considered a major determining factor of the
socio-economic status of a rural household, though there
are other factors that also contribute to defining a
social class. Occupation and relations of production
often characterize a social class. For example: a jailla
(fisher) or a kamla badailla/kishen (day laborer/farm
laborer as they are called in different parts of the
coastal zone) is perceived as member of a distinct class
with low status; a small farmer is called a chasha
(owner cultivator) by the bhadrolok (gentry/absentee
landlord); and a big landowner gives the image of a
malik (proprietor/patron). Historically, small farmer is
a transient class between the propertied (landowner) and
the landless. Along with the process of land
concentration and pauperization, the bulk of the rural
landless crowds in city slums and turns to wage labor or
to self-employment in a wide range of occupations, such
as, garbage collection, peddling and rickshaw pulling,
who are no better off than the wage laborers.
In rural areas, agriculture laborers
comprise the largest livelihood group in terms of
number. At least one in every three rural households
lives on agriculture labor. The group with smallholdings
closely follows them. Among the non-farmers (those whose
principal occupation is not agriculture), fishers are
the single largest group. In urban areas, the majority
is poor and either sells labor in the formal and
informal sectors or is engaged in a wide range of
self-employment activities.
The coastal zone of Bangladesh is the
habitat of about seven million households. The four
broad
livelihood groups as mentioned above, together comprise
71 percent of the total coastal households. Their
distribution is shown in Table 4.
Table 4: Distribution of major livelihood groups
|
Livelihood groups in the coastal zone |
Households (year
2001) |
| Number
in million (estimated) |
Percentage |
| Agriculture laborer |
1.81 |
26.4 |
| Small farmer |
1.79 |
26.1 |
| Fisher |
0.53 |
7.8 |
| Urban poor |
0.70 |
10.2 |
| Total (4 groups)
|
4.87 |
70.5 |
| Total coastal zone
|
6.86 |
100.0 |
| Source:
BBS, 1999; 2001 |
Agriculture laborer
There are 1.81 million households in the coastal
districts categorized as “agriculture labor households”,
which is the largest livelihood group in the coastal
zone in terms of number. An agriculture labor household
refers to one “whose major source of income is obtained
by working as agricultural laborer” (BBS, 1999).
According to the 1996 agriculture census, agriculture
labor is the predominant source of living for 33 percent
of the rural households. This proportion is lower than
outside the coastal zone (37%). The districts of Bhola,
Satkhira, Khulna and Jessore have higher concentration
of agriculture laborers than other districts, while the
districts of Feni and Chittagong have lower
concentrations. In the coastal zone, small, medium and
large farmers are engaged in wage labor in higher
proportions compared to the farmers outside the coastal
zone.
Agriculture laborers are often mixed
up as rural landless. According to estimates based on
the 1996 agriculture census data, the majority of
agriculture labor households (55%) are small farmers and
some are even medium (2%) and large (0.02%) farmers. The
rest of them (43%) consist of non-farm households,
owning no or less than 0.05 acre of land.
Small farmers
Small farmers are the second largest group closely
following the agriculture laborers. There are 1.79
million small farmer households in the coastal zone8,
constituting 26.1 percent of the coastal households.
Small farmers (including agriculture labor households
possessing small farms) account for 58 percent of the
total of rural households in the coastal zone, while
they are 51% outside the coastal zone. The districts of
Pirojpur, Barisal, Shariatpur, Chandpur, Feni,
Lakshmipur and Noakhali have relatively high proportions
of small farmers: more than 65%. In the past decades,
many medium and large farmers have turned into small
farmers because of the increasing population (consequent
fragmentation of holding) and natural process of
pauperization.
Agriculture census data shows that --
while the proportion of small farmers (and also non-farm
households) had increased -- the proportion of medium
and large farmers had sharply declined during the
inter-census period from 1960 to 1996.
Fishers
According estimates based on the 1996 agriculture census
data, the number of fisher (fish catching) households
has been estimated at 0.53 million, forming eight
percent of the coastal households. Among the rural farm
households, they are, however, 14 percent. This
proportion is much higher than outside the coastal zone
where fisher households account for only 6 percent of
total farm households.
Although the districts of Chittagong,
Barisal and Noakhali have high concentrations of fisher
households in terms of absolute numbers, in terms of
percentages of households, the highest concentration is
found in the district of Barguna (38%), followed by
Khulna (29%), Jhalakati (26%) and Satkhira (22%). These
are all sea facing districts. The districts of Gopalganj
and Narail, which are not sea facing, have the lowest
proportion of fishers (less than 5%). Though fishers are
also farmers (in the sense of owning cultivable land),
the majority of them are small farmers.10 Among the
fishers, 80 percent are self-employed, nine percent are
wage laborers and 11 percent are unpaid family helpers
(BBS, 2002e: 112).
Urban poor
Reliable estimates of the population of the urban poor
are not available. According to the Household Investment
Survey 1998-99 of BBS (BBS, 2002a), 47 percent of the
urban households are “poor”. The survey indicates that
“day labor” is the primary occupation of 21 percent of
the urban heads of households. Besides, there are many
who are engaged as “contractual wage laborers”, mostly
in the formal sector. Assuming 50 percent of the urban
households as “poor”, their number is estimated at 0.7
million.
Industrial workers are mostly
concentrated in metropolitan areas of Chittagong and
Khulna. Besides, many are engaged in the informal
sector. Many poor people are engaged as transport
workers, restaurant workers or domestic servants. There
is lack of data on occupational distribution of urban
population in BBS literature or any other macro studies.
The situation of the poor is precarious. There is
job-uncertainty, wages are low and working days are
long.
Source : COASTAL LIVELIHOODS : situation and
context, Working Paper, Program Development Office for
Integrated Coastal Zone Management Plan (PDO-ICZMP).
|