|
Location and history
The
Sundarban Reserved Forest (SRF), occupying an area of
around 6,017 square kilometres or 600,000 hectares,
represents 51 percent of the total reserved forest area of
Bangladesh and as such forms a rich and diverse ecosystem
with potential for sustainable natural resource
management. Man has exploited the Sundarban for centuries
but the forest was not given Reserve status by the
Forestry Department until 1875. Since that time the Forest
Department has managed the forest and other natural
resources of the SRF through adherence to management plans
which it prepares at regular intervals.
Early management simply concentrated
on revenue collection and the enforcement of felling rules
to reduce overcutting, particularly in the eastern
portion. The first real professional forest management
planning was introduced in the SRF in the early 1900s with
the introduction of the Curtis Working Plan.
However, more recently forest
resource management has shifted to increase emphasis upon
environmental and socio-economic issues.
The following table presents the
fractions represented by forest and other land types in
the Sundarban.
Areas in Sundarban
|
Type |
Area (km2) |
Percent |
|
Forest area |
3997 |
66
|
|
Sandbars, grass, bare ground |
115
|
2
|
|
Rivers |
1905 |
32
|
|
Total SRF (of which 1397 km2 represented by 3 wildlife
sanctuaries) |
6017 |
100
|
Source:
Forest Resources Management Project 1998 (modified)
Forest Resources
The forest resource is defined as
wood materials such as timber and fuelwood. Other products
such as leaves, bark, and other associated non-woody
plants are covered in the web page dealing with Non-Wood
Forest Products.
The area of forest represented by the
principal timber species is of interest for forest
managers. The table below indicates the areas of forest
types and is based upon stratification undertaken by ODA
and refined using digitised information from satellite
imagery (SPOT 1989) and aerial photography (1995).
Areas by species
|
Species |
Area (km2) |
Percent (%) |
|
Production forest |
Wildlife sanctuary |
Total |
|
Sundri |
1801 |
170 |
1905 |
46 |
|
Gewa |
1056 |
262 |
1318 |
32 |
|
Goran |
303 |
345 |
648 |
16 |
|
Keora |
59 |
24 |
83 |
2 |
|
Passur |
28 |
0 |
28 |
1 |
|
Baen |
10 |
2 |
12 |
0 |
|
Tree plantations |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Grass, bare ground |
46 |
23 |
69 |
2 |
|
Sandbars |
27 |
19 |
46 |
1 |
|
Total |
3267 |
845 |
4112 |
100 |
Source:
Forest Resources Management Project 1998 (modified)
Although the overall area of forest
in the SRF is known, the crucial question is what is the
volume by species, what is the growth rate and is the
extraction exceeding the growth? This sustainability
question is partially answered through reference to the
results of various forest inventories.
Forest Sustainability
The results of four independent
inventories undertaken over the past seventy years would
seem to indicate that the overall volume per hectare has
decreased. Moreover, closer analysis of three inventories
undertaken in 1959, 1983 and 1996 indicate a marked
reduction in total standing volume (expressed in millions
of cubic metres) for the two principal species of economic
importance, Sundri and Gewa. The following table
highlights the dramatic decrease.
Volume
per hectare and total standing volume as estimated by
Forestal, ODA (now DIFD) and the Forest Resources
Management Project (FRMP)
|
Species |
Mean volume/ha
(m3/ha) |
Total standing volume
(million m3) |
|
Forestal 1959 |
ODA 1983 |
FRMP 1996 |
Forestal 1959 |
ODA 1983 |
FRMP 1996 |
|
Sundri |
34.5 |
19.9 |
17.8 |
13.0 |
7.9 |
7.1 |
|
Gewa |
8.7 |
4.6 |
2.1 |
3.3 |
1.8 |
0.8 |
Source:
Chaffey et al 1983 (ODA), Revilla et al 1998 (FRMP)
The reasons for the decline in Sundri,
Heriteria fomes is twofold. First, as a
valuable timber species with real commercial value, it has
been subject to heavy exploitation, both legal and
illegal. Second, subtle changes in the ecology of the
area, notably increases in salinity and siltation have
resulted in hostile anaerobic conditions in which the
Sundri finds difficulty in healthy respiration. This has
resulted in dieback whereby the tree is progressively
defoliated from the top downwards.
The decline in Gewa, Excoecaria
agallocha is largely attributable to harvesting of
around 50,000 m3 per annum as feedstock to Khulna
Newsprint Mill for the production of newsprint. Although
the mill is scheduled to close, one line continues to
operate.
In recognition of the importance to
manage the forest resources in the SRF on a sustainable
basis, the Forest Department imposed a logging moratorium
in 1989 on all timber species except Gewa. Diseased Sundri
is felled and cleared as part of a sanitation programme
and of course illegal logging by fishermen and other
collectors continues to have an impact.
Summary
In
summary it can be said that the SRF has been well managed
by the Forest Department for over a hundred years and
represents one of the very few areas in the world where
resource exploitation is controlled through strict
enforcement. Although some illegal logging occurs, there
is no evidence of encroachment or settlement within the
Reserve and this is due to the vigilance of the Forest
Department and respect for the Royal Bengal Tiger which is
a renowned predator. This is a unique situation in the
developing world. The three Wildlife Sanctuaries, declared
as World Heritage Sites in December 1997, remain fully
protected. However, when the forest resources within the
SRF have recovered, the area can and should continue to
provide goods and services to the people of Bangladesh as
well as revenue to pay for careful management of the
environment. Future sustainability of the Sundarban will
be contingent upon political will, environmental awareness
and the continued support from the Forest Department as
custodians of the resources.
|